The file you keep on each supplier, kept living.

A state-board inspector grades the file you keep on each supplier as a living system, not an onboarding folder. Veritura builds it as six structured elements, keeps each dated document current, and gates every order against it.

A date that has passed is the most useful thing on the file

Every dated document on the file carries a living status computed from the date the document itself states: current, renewal due, or expired. The gap is shown as a gap, and an element that has nothing on it says so instead of leaving the row blank. The file publishes how many of the six elements are documented, which is a documentation status, never an approval, a ranking, or a statement about any product.

Six structured elements, and what each one takes to satisfy.

Each element holds a named thing, has a stated way to be satisfied, and carries its own date.

01

Manufacturer identity

Grey-market sellers borrow real manufacturers' names. The supplier's registered name and address, FDA registration number, and FEI number are confirmed against the openFDA registration snapshot when one is available and marked on file when it is not. A name that does not resolve is surfaced for review rather than quietly accepted.

A name that does not resolve to a registration is surfaced, never quietly accepted, because grey-market sellers borrow real manufacturers' names and a folder cannot tell the difference.

  • Registered name, address, registration, FEI
  • Resolved against a dated registration snapshot
  • Unresolved names surfaced, never assumed
Discover Methodology
Manufacturer identity: a designed view of the Veritura workspace

02

Accreditation

Certificates lapse quietly, and lapsed is how an inspector finds them. NABP, VAWD, or an equivalent is held with the effective and expiry dates the certificate itself states, so the element reads renewal due as the date approaches and expired once it has passed, and a lapsed certificate surfaces on the file before an order goes out against it.

Renewal due appears before expiry, on the date the certificate itself states, so the lapse an inspector would find is found by you first, with time to act.

  • Effective and expiry dates read from the certificate
  • Renewal due before, expired after
  • Surfaces before an order, not after
Discover Order-level COA traceability
Accreditation: a designed view of the Veritura workspace

03

FDA registration status

A firm's FDA record can change without anyone telling its buyers. Registration and listing are checked against live openFDA enforcement and recall records, with any hit on the firm surfaced directly on the file. This element carries no renewal date because the check never stops: a firm clean at onboarding can pick up an enforcement record months later.

This element has no renewal date because the check never stops: registration and listing are read from public FDA records at every check, and a hit lands on the file the day it appears.

  • Read from public FDA records, not a hand-off
  • Any hit on the firm shown on the file
  • No renewal date, because it never stops
Discover Supplier packet diligence
FDA registration status: a designed view of the Veritura workspace

04

Quality agreement and documentation specifications

The signed quality agreement and its renewal date are held on the file and tracked like every other dated document. Your required certificate panels and document standards for the supplier are evaluated against what each packet actually contains, so this element is re-evaluated on every packet the supplier sends and moves when their documentation does.

Your required panels are compared against every packet the supplier sends, so documentation specifications move with the supplier's real behaviour rather than with a promise made at onboarding.

  • The executed agreement, with its renewal date
  • Required panels compared with each packet
  • Re-evaluated on every document received
Discover Trust Center
Quality agreement and documentation specifications: a designed view of the Veritura workspace

05

Ongoing review

A one-time onboarding stamp is stale the day after it is issued. A review cadence with a next-review date gives the whole file a living current, due, or overdue status, composed from what the file already holds. It is the element that makes the file a system rather than a folder, and the one ClearGate reads at order time.

The whole file carries one computed status, current, due, or overdue, and ClearGate reads it as a rail at order time, so a file that stopped moving cannot hide until the next inspection.

  • A next-review date the file computes
  • Current, due, or overdue for the whole file
  • Read as a rail at order time
Discover The evidence engine
Ongoing review: a designed view of the Veritura workspace

What changes

What you get, in practice.

01Six elements, each with a date

The file an inspector grades as living, kept current, due, or overdue by the documents themselves.

02Lapses found by you first

Renewal due appears before expiry, on the date the certificate states.

03The file gates the order

ClearGate reads the file's status as a rail, so a stale file shows up at order time.

The method

1. Intake

Documents arrive by email, upload, or API and are retained as received.

2. Check

Read against identity anchors, your policy, and named public sources.

3. Decide

A named person signs every material decision, with the reason kept.

4. Issue

Cleared orders issue serialized Passports and Seals.

5. Retain

Every document and decision stays on the record for seven years.

One honest label per element

Computed from what is on file and where it came from, never a double label.

On file

The document is held as the operator supplied it, and recorded that way.

Resolved at source

The element resolved against an FDA source record rather than a document the supplier sent.

Confirmed at source

The source itself confirmed it. Nothing weaker earns this label.

Renewal due or expired

Read from the date the document states, on the same clock for every dated element.

Not supplied

Nothing has been provided for this element, and the file shows the gap instead of an empty row.

Everything on this page, in full.

The complete text, for the reader who wants the whole story before a call.

Six structured elements, and what each one takes to satisfy.

The file is not a folder of attachments. Each element holds a named thing, has a stated way to be satisfied, and carries its own date.

Manufacturer identity

Grey-market sellers borrow real manufacturers' names. Legal name, address, FDA registration and FEI number, confirmed against the openFDA registration snapshot when one is available, marked on file when it is not.

What satisfies itThe supplier's legal name and address, its FDA registration number and its FEI number. In the workspace the supplier name you run the qualification under seeds this element.

The date it carriesNo expiry of its own. The name is resolved against a dated registration snapshot, and a name that does not resolve is surfaced for review rather than recorded as absent.

Accreditation

Certificates lapse quietly, and lapsed is how an inspector finds them. NABP, VAWD, or equivalent held with its effective and expiry dates, so a lapsed certificate surfaces on the file before an order goes out against it.

What satisfies itThe accrediting body named, plus the certificate itself. Attach the document and the dates the document states are read off the page, which outrank a date typed in by hand.

The date it carriesAn effective date and an expiry date. The element reads renewal due as the expiry approaches and expired once it has passed.

FDA registration status

A firm's FDA record can change without anyone telling its buyers. Registration and listing checked against live openFDA enforcement and recall feeds, with any hit on the firm surfaced directly on the file.

What satisfies itPublic FDA source records, not a document the supplier hands you. This element is read from the source, so nobody has to attest to it.

The date it carriesNo renewal date, because the check never stops. A firm clean at onboarding can pick up an enforcement record months later, and the hit lands on the file it belongs to.

Quality agreement

Signed agreements get filed once and forgotten until the renewal has lapsed. The signed quality agreement and its renewal date are held on the file and tracked the same way as every other dated document you rely on.

What satisfies itThe executed agreement. Attach it and the renewal date the document itself states is read from the page.

The date it carriesA renewal date, on the same clock as accreditation: renewal due before it, expired after it.

Documentation specifications

Every supplier says their COAs meet your spec; few packets get checked against it. Your required COA panels and document standards for the supplier, evaluated against what each packet actually contains, not assumed.

What satisfies itThe packets themselves. The COA read is this element: the panels you require are compared with the panels the document actually carries.

The date it carriesNo date of its own. It is re-evaluated on every packet the supplier sends, so the element moves when their documentation moves.

Ongoing review

A one-time onboarding stamp is stale the day after it's issued. A review cadence with a next-review date, so the file carries a living current, due, or overdue status instead of a stamp.

What satisfies itThe cadence you set, and a dated periodic review composed from what the file already holds: the element rollup, the firm-matched FDA enforcement records, and the lot history.

The date it carriesA next-review date. This is the element that makes the file living rather than an onboarding folder, and it is the one an inspector reads first.

The file publishes how many of the six elements are documented. Documented status per element, never an approval.

A date that has passed is the most useful thing on the file.

Every dated document on the file carries a living status. The gap is shown as a gap, and the element that has nothing on it says so instead of leaving the row blank.

The file's review status

Set on the ongoing-review element, and the one status a whole file carries. It is computed from the next-review date, never stamped by hand.

Current

The file is inside its review window.

Review due

The next review is up.

Review overdue

The next-review date has passed, and the file says so rather than going quiet.

No cadence set

No review cadence has been set yet, so the file does not claim to be current.

Each element's own label

One honest label per element, computed from what is on file and where it came from. Never a confusing double-label.

On fileThe document is held on the file as the operator supplied it, and it is recorded that way.

FDA-source matchedThe element resolved against an FDA source record rather than against a document the supplier sent.

Confirmed at sourceThe source itself confirmed it. Nothing weaker earns this label.

PartialSome of what the element needs is present and some of it is not.

Renewal dueThe dated document is approaching the date the document itself states.

ExpiredThe dated document is past the date the document itself states.

Not providedNothing has been supplied for this element. The file shows the gap instead of an empty row.

These labels describe documentation currency on one element. They are not an evidence posture, not a ClearGate decision, and not a receiving disposition, and none of them says anything about a product.

The periodic review itself is one action. It composes the dated supplier review from what is already on the file, the element rollup, the firm-matched FDA enforcement records, and the lot history, signs it, and resets the cadence clock. Nothing is re-typed, so nothing is re-typed wrong.

Suppliers

Ongoing review due Jul 30

Corrected source route requested

The score grades the documentation evidence on file only. It is not an approval, a ranking, a certification, or a statement about any product.

One decision per order, against the policy you set.

ClearGate reads the file and your configured policy and returns one decision when an order is placed. You set the bar; we keep the record.

Does not meet policy

A ClearGate decision always means the documentation meets your policy. It never means Veritura approves the supplier.

The file is one of four rails an order screen fires.

Screening an order runs them together, and each rail reports its own result with the reason on the record.

Supplier ClearGate

The supplier's documentation measured against the policy you configured.

Substance eligibility

Whether the substance is eligible to compound for a facility type, against the current FDA lists.

Prescriber registry

The prescriber resolved against NPPES, live.

Six-element supplier qualification file

Your supplier record: the six elements and their dates, as they stand at the moment of the order.

Configurable presets and bounded custom rules, a tamper-evident signed decision log, and one endpoint.

POST/v1/cleargateOne call at order time returns one decision against your configured policy, with a tamper-evident signed record behind it.

Presets are Strict, Standard, or Lenient. A custom policy with per-rule toggles, thresholds, and operator-attested items is part of the Facility plan.

How the file gets built

Two ways in, and they are labeled differently for a reason.

A qualification you run yourself is automated end to end. A delivered diligence memo gets a reviewer's pass on the final language. The record always says which one it is.

Run a qualification in the workspace

The supplier name seeds the file

Name the supplier and, if you want to scope it, the API or product. The name seeds the manufacturer-identity element and the FDA lanes start from there.

Attach the packet

A COA, an SDS, a certificate of conformance, whatever you hold. The engine reads it and the elements fill from what the documents actually say.

Attach a document to a specific element

Attach the accreditation certificate or the quality agreement to its own element, and the dates the document states are read and used. A document's own dates outrank a typed one.

It re-checks itself

The file is re-verified against live FDA enforcement and recall records on every sweep, so a signal that lands after onboarding reaches the file it belongs to.

The reviewed diligence memo

Automated extraction is used for speed. Human review is used before the final memo so pharmacy-facing deliverables do not rely on unreviewed automation.

Packet intake

Supplier quote, COA, spec sheet, manufacturer statement, email text, and links are collected with source labels.

AI-assisted screen

Fields are drafted for API identity, supplier name, lot, lab, method, dates, purity value, file metadata, and verification links.

Archive comparison

Hashes, visual fingerprints, lots, lab and purity patterns, and supplier names are compared against the existing evidence index where coverage exists.

Human memo pass

An analyst checks the automated record for phrasing, source support, ambiguous fields, and could-not-verify limits before delivery.

Escalation list

The final memo separates observed facts, missing documentation, supplier follow-up questions, and limits that require lab or regulatory diligence.

The three questions a packet has to answer.

What lands in the internal file.

Source matrix, evidence IDs

Each source is labeled so findings can be traced back to reviewed material.

Reconciliation, fields and conflicts

API, lot, lab, method, purity, dates, supplier identity, and manufacturer evidence are compared.

Escalation, ask-next questions

Questions your team can send to the supplier or preserve internally before the next diligence step.

Veritura gives you a preserved record of what was reviewed and what should be asked next. It does not approve suppliers or products.

Where a stale file leaves you

Six gaps a folder leaves open and a living file closes.

These are the places a customer, an auditor, or an attorney can push, and the reason the file has to keep moving after onboarding.

Inconsistent COA coverage

Lots arriving without a lot-specific COA leave holes an auditor or customer can find.

What the file does

Every order missing a lot-matched COA is flagged before it ships, against the documentation specifications you set on the file.

No independent authenticity check

A filed COA isn't a verified one. Filing a document and checking it are different acts, and only one of them survives scrutiny.

What the file does

The issuing lab is resolved against a verify-portal registry with a ready-to-send confirmation email, and only a recorded lab reply flips a document to source-confirmed.

Weak order-to-lot traceability

If you can't tie a sale to its exact lot and COA on demand, every order is a question you can't answer fast.

What the file does

An Evidence Passport ties each order to its lot, COA, supplier packet, and reviewer, and the supplier's qualification snapshot rides with it.

Reused-COA blind spot

Suppliers sometimes reuse or lightly edit one COA across multiple lots; without a cross-lot check it goes unnoticed.

What the file does

Reuse and duplicate-document signals run on every review, and a supplier's new document is compared against the structure of their own prior documents.

Slow audit readiness

Scrambling to assemble proof under a deadline is exactly when gaps surface.

What the file does

One click builds an inspector-ready index of every saved check, supplier, lot, COA reference, the diligence performed, and each supplier qualification file current as of the pull.

No ongoing supplier monitoring

A supplier clean at onboarding can pick up a recall or enforcement action months later.

What the file does

Saved suppliers and lots are watched against FDA enforcement and recall feeds, with alerts when a new strong source or lot match needs review.

This is a self-assessment of documentation exposure, not legal, regulatory, or safety advice, and not a determination about any specific supplier or product. Veritura performs independent document diligence only: we check that supplier documentation is complete, consistent, and free of reuse or tamper signals. We do not certify product quality, confirm safety, approve suppliers, or claim FDA approval.

The file never overstates what was checked.

Every element carries where its evidence came from, so an inspector sees what was actually verified and when it was last checked.

Veritura evaluated

Read from the document or from a public source. The engine saw it itself.

Operator attested

You confirm what we cannot read. The element records that it was attested, not evaluated.

Every element is labeled Veritura evaluated, read from the document or a public source, or Operator attested, where you confirm what we cannot read.

What the file is for.

  • Use before deciding whether a packet deserves physical sample testing.
  • Use before wiring money or escalating a supplier packet internally.
  • Use to preserve a document record and better supplier questions.
  • Do not use as supplier approval, product certification, legal advice, or wet-lab testing.
  • Veritura does not test medicine, approve suppliers, recommend purchases, or make medical, legal, product-safety, or FDA-approval determinations. There is no paid or subjective placement: suppliers cannot pay for a better result or a better position, no listing fee, no subscription, and no pay-to-rank. Where results are ordered rather than filtered, the order is set by a published documentation-coverage grade, and that grade is never a recommendation, a preference, or a statement about any product.

    Veritura verifies the completeness and consistency of documentation and sourcing, not product quality, safety, efficacy, legality, or FDA approval. A "Verified by Veritura" profile or check means the submitted paperwork was read for documentation completeness, consistency, and evidence status; it is not a certification, an approval, or a representation that any product is safe.

    AI may assist extraction and drafting. Delivered written diligence memos receive human QA. Self-serve checks, ClearGate decisions, and Passports are automated unless the record explicitly says otherwise, and no human sign-off is claimed on them.

    Not product testing. Reports are based on submitted documents, public pages, metadata, and snapshots. Veritura does not test physical material.

    Authenticity limits. A report may identify metadata, repeated file signals, links, and inconsistencies. It cannot prove document provenance unless an issuing lab or source independently confirms it.

Open a file on the supplier you buy from most.

Create your dashboard and run a qualification, or talk to us about your supplier base.

Veritura reads and connects the paperwork behind an order. It never tests, grades, or endorses the medicine itself, and it never releases anything on its own.
The boundaryDocumentation evidence, not medicinal judgmentVeritura

What runs underneath.

4Things every document is reconciled against: the issuing laboratory, the standard, the file, and every other document seen
17Forensic signals read on every file, from reused signatures to edit stacks
6Dated elements in every supplier file, each current, due, or overdue
0Autonomous releases, ever. A person signs every material decision

FAQ

Manufacturer identity, accreditation, FDA registration status, quality agreement, documentation specifications, and ongoing review. Each holds a named thing, has a stated way to be satisfied, and carries its own date.

How many elements are documented and whether dated documents are current, due, or overdue. It is a documentation status, never an approval, a ranking, or a statement about any product.

ClearGate reads the file's rollup as one of its four rails at order time, so a file that stopped moving shows up before the order goes out, not at the next inspection.

Still have questions? Talk to a person.