Why independent
Transparency shows a document. Independent verification proves it.
The people selling you a product should not be the ones grading its paperwork. A forged lab report looks identical to a real one; the question that matters is who checked it, and whether they have a reason to tell you the truth.
The difference
A supplier's portal vs. independent verification.
Both can show you paperwork. Only one reads it, compares it against every other document on record, and can replay the decision it produced.
A supplier's own portal
Self-published- Who issues it
- The company selling the product
- Independent check
- None. Display only
- Supplier coverage
- One network
- Checks the document itself
- No. It shows the file
- If someone questions it
- The same file, shown again
- Under real scrutiny
- Conflict of interest
Veritura
Independent- Who issues it
- A party that does not sell the product
- Independent check
- Four lanes: lab, standard, file, network
- Supplier coverage
- Every supplier you use
- Checks the document itself
- Hashed, read, fingerprinted, compared
- If someone questions it
- The decision replays, or it changed
- Under real scrutiny
- No conflict. That is the point
What independent means
Three things a supplier portal structurally can't be.
Independent
We don't sell, source, or distribute any product. When we verify a document there is no incentive to look the other way, which is what makes the check carry weight.
Supplier-agnostic
One independent layer over every supplier you buy from, instead of one portal per vendor that you will never get them all to join. Reuse only shows up when one layer sees them all, because the check compares each new document against every other document on record.
Verified, not displayed
A forged COA displays just as cleanly as a real one. Every file is hashed and read, its stated values are checked against the limits that apply to them, and only the issuing lab's own recorded reply can move a document to source-confirmed.
What you can hand someone
One independent, verifiable link, per order.
The same record works for a provider, a payor, an auditor, or a patient. It carries the proof instead of asking anyone to take a supplier's word.
- Bound to the order and the lot: the COA, supplier packet, lot, customer, and reviewer reconciled into one record rather than a loose PDF. That binding is permanent, which is how a recall published months later still reaches a record already issued.
- The test record as documented on the COA, with our independent check that the documentation is complete, consistent, and free of reuse and tamper signals. A field the document does not state is printed as not stated, never filled in.
- Read independently of the supplier, so the record's weight does not depend on the seller's say-so. A source status only moves to confirmed when the issuing lab's own reply is on record.